One Health activities to reinforce intersectoral coordination at local levels in India.

India's dense human and animal populations, agricultural economy, changing environment, and social dynamics support conditions for emergence/re-emergence of zoonotic diseases that necessitate a One Health (OH) approach for control. In addition to OH national level frameworks, effective OH driven strategies that promote local intersectoral coordination and collaboration are needed to truly address zoonotic diseases in India. We conducted a literature review to assess the landscape of OH activities at local levels in India that featured intersectoral coordination and collaboration and supplemented it with our own experience conducting OH related activities with local partners. We identified key themes and examples in local OH activities. Our landscape assessment demonstrated that intersectoral collaboration primarily occurs through specific research activities and during outbreaks, however, there is limited formal coordination among veterinary, medical, and environmental professionals on the day-to-day prevention and detection of zoonotic diseases at district/sub-district levels in India. Examples of local OH driven intersectoral coordination include the essential role of veterinarians in COVID-19 diagnostics, testing of human samples in veterinary labs for Brucella and leptospirosis in Punjab and Tamil Nadu, respectively, and implementation of OH education targeted to school children and farmers in rural communities. There is an opportunity to strengthen local intersectoral coordination between animal, human and environmental health sectors by building on these activities and formalizing the existing collaborative networks. As India moves forward with broad OH initiatives, OH networks and experience at the local level from previous or ongoing activities can support implementation from the ground up.

Does the initial chest radiograph severity in COVID-19 impact the short- and long-term outcome? - a perspective from India.

PURPOSE: The chest radiograph (CXR) is among the most widely used investigations in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Little is known about its predictive role on the long-term outcome. The purpose of this study was to explore its association with the short and long-term outcome in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: A total of 1530 patients were assessed for the presence, radiographic pattern and distribution of lung lesions observed on baseline chest radiographs obtained at admission. The Brixia scoring system was applied for semiquantitative assessment of lesion severity. Short-term outcome was determined by clinical severity, duration of hospitalization and mortality. The 1415 survivors in this group were assessed after 5-6 months for the presence of residual symptoms. RESULTS: About 67% patients had an abnormal baseline CXR. Bilateral involvement with a basal preponderance was observed and ground-glass opacification was the most frequent finding. The Brixia score ranged from 0 to 16, median 2, interquartile range (IQR) [0-6]. About 36% patients were symptomatic on 5-6-month follow-up, with fatigability being the commonest symptom. A good correlation was observed between the CXR score and disease severity as well as duration of hospitalization. On multivariate analysis, the CXR score was found to be a significant independent predictor of in-patient mortality as well as presence of long-term residual symptoms in survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Disease severity as seen on the chest radiograph appears to play an important role in driving the short and long-term consequences of COVID-19 and could serve as a prognostic indicator, which influences short-term management and long-term follow-up.